Chasing the Search Engines' Algorithms... Should You or Shouldn't
You?
By Robin Nobles
It's a common occurrence. SEOs often spend countless hours trying
to 'break" a search engine's algorithm. "If I could just crack Google's
algo, my pages would soar to the top of the rankings!" Let's look
at some flaws in this way of thinking.
1. Picture the Google engineers and tech folks turning the algo
dial as soon as you "think" you have "cracked" the algo. Your rankings
may fall, and you would have to figure out what's working with the
engine right nöw. In other words, your rankings may nevër be long
term.
2. Instead of spending all of this time trying to impress a search
engine with a perfect page, why not impress your true target audience...
your customers. Has Google, MSN, or Yahoo! Search ever bought anything
from you? They're not your target audience. Your customers are your
target audience. Write your pages and content for them.
3. When you expend so much of your energy chasing algorithms, you
often focus on only a few elements that influence ranking – those
elements that are working right nöw and that you hope will give
your pages the best chance for success. It is said that Google has
over 100 ranking elements that influence ranking and relevancy.
Some are more important than others. But focusing on just one or
two "main" elements and discounting the rest can prove disastrous
to a Web site.
A different approach . . .
Wouldn't you rather achieve top rankings and keep them there, and
have those rankings equate to salës and monëy in your back pocket?
After all, isn't it ultimately the salës you're after, as opposed
to just the rankings? If those rankings don't equate to traffïc
that equates to salës, you löse, any way you look at it. Five Basic
Steps for Achieving Top Rankings without Chasing Algorithms
1. Forget about the search engines. Yes, you heard me correctly.
The search engines aren't and nevër will be your "ideal target audience."
They don't buy your goods and services. They're not who you should
be trying to please with your Web pages and site. Instead, write
your Web page content for your target audience.
2. Don't ever forget the basics. No matter what's happening in
the algorithms, continue using your main keyword phrase prominently
in your title tag, META description and keyword tags, link text,
body, heading tags, and so forth. That way, when the algo dial is
turned, you won't have to make changes to all of your pages. You'll
always be ready.
3. Focus your keyword-containing tags and body text on one keyword
phrase only. Each page should be focused on one keyword phrase,
and each page should have its own unique tags.
4. Write well-crafted content for your Web pages, and add new content
on a regular basis. If content is king, context is queen. Focus
on your keyword phrase, synonyms and related words, and surrounding
text. Use a program like ThemeMaster if you need help determining
those supporting words.
5. Remember that both on-page and off-page factors are important.
Don't sacrifice one for the other. On-page factors are your tags,
body text, prominence, relevance, etc. Off-page factors are link
popularity (quality and number of your inbound links) and link reputation
(what those inbound links "say" about your Web page when they link
to you). What about search engine research? Isn't it important?
It's crucial.
Let me give you an example. At the beginning of this year, pages
began falling out of Google's index. The forums were alive with
speculation and what to do about it.
Through research, we determined this was a compliancy issue. By
having compliant code, the search engine spiders are more easily
able to spider the content.
The solution? Make sure you use a DOCTYPE tag and an ISO Character
Set Statement at the top of every Web page.
For example:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.1 Transitional//EN">
<META HTTP-EQUIV=content-type CONTENT="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
If you didn't know about the compliancy issues, you could have
made changes to your Web pages that didn't need to be made, wasted
countless hours trying this or that, all to come up dry.
Research helps to make sure you remain on top of what's happening
in the search engine industry. It's what sets you apart from other
SEOs. You make your decisions based on research and facts, versus
speculation and theory.
In Conclusion...
"Take it from someone who has been in this business for nine years
and studies the algorithms closely - don't chase the algorithms.
You say that you have a #2 ranking for a certain keyword phrase
that alone is bringing your site 550 visitors per day? Great. In
the time that you have spent gaining that ranking, I have written
285 pages of unique content, obtained 821 links, etc., and collectively
I am getting over 1,300 visitors per day," says Jerry West of WebMarketingNow.
In other words, by focusing on more than just chasing algorithms,
you have the potential of having a much more successful Web site.
About
The Author
Robin Nobles conducts live SEO
workshops in locations across North America. She also teaches
online SEO training
and offers the Workshop Resource
Center, a networking community for SEOs. Localized SEO training
is being offered through the Search
Engine Academy. Copyright 2005 Robin Nobles. All rights reserved.
|
DMOZ in 2005
(a.k.a. The Open Directory Project)
By Phil Craven (c) 2005 WebWorkShop
The original concept of DMOZ was excellent for its time. The DMOZ
site's About page makes these
statements about the concept, and about the reasons for the directory's
creation:-
"Automated search engines are increasingly
unable to turn up useful results to search queries. The small paid
editorial staffs at commercial directory sites can't keep up with
submissions, and the quality and comprehensiveness of their directories
has suffered. Link rot is setting in and they can't keep pace with
the growth of the Internet."
"The Open Directory follows in the footsteps
of some of the most important editor/contributor projects of the
20th century. Just as the Oxford English Dictionary became the definitive
word on words through the efforts of volunteers, the Open Directory
follows in its footsteps to become the definitive catalog of the
Web."
But things have changed a lot since DMOZ began in the mid 1990s.
Since then, Google came along with very relevant search results,
and they were kind enough to show the other engines how to produce
such relevant results. That caused dramatic improvements, to the
extent that top search engines have been able to provide very relevant
search results for some time, and they provide a lot more of them
than DMOZ is able to do.
The small paid editorial staffs at commercial directory sites
still can't keep up with submissions, but their backlogs are small
when compared with DMOZ's massive backlog. According to reports,
there are over a million site submissions that are waiting to be
reviewed, and delays of several years between submitting a site
and it being reviewed are not uncommon. The backlog problem is so
huge that many editors have redefined the problem so that it no
longer exists. To them there is no backlog, because the submitted
sites are not there to be reviewed. They are merely a low priority
pool of sites that they can dip into if they want to, and some of
them prefer to find sites on their own.
Link rot (dead links) has become widespread in DMOZ through the
years, and they certainly can't "keep pace with the growth of the
Web". There isn't a single reason for the creation of DMOZ that
DMOZ itself doesn't nöw suffer from.
So how come such an excellent original concept ended up with a
directory that has the same problems that it sought to solve, and
on a much largër scale?
One reason is that the Web has grown at a much faster pace than
was perhaps anticipated, and the DMOZ editors simply can't keep
up. Another reason is that there are simply not enough editors who
are adding sites to the directory. At the time of writing, the DMOZ
front page boasts 69,412 editors, but that is the number of
editors that they've had since the beginning, and most of them are
no longer there. A recent report stated that there are currently
about 10,000 editors who are able to edit, and that only around
3,000 of those are active in building the directory. The word "active"
is used to describe editors who actually edit quite often, but as
little as one edit every few months is acceptable. The word doesn't
mean "busy", although some of them are.
With so few people doing anything, it isn't even possible for
them to keep up with the link rot in such a huge directory, and
there's the ever increasing problem of listings that link to topics
other than what they were listed for. It simply isn't possible for
them to maintain the directory as they would like.
The idea of becoming "the definitive catalog of the Web" was a
fine one, but it turned out to be an impossible dream. The purpose
of DMOZ is dead. Today's search engines produce excellent results
in large quantities, and much more quickly than drilling down into
a directory to find something.
So is there any value at all in the DMOZ directory? As a useful
catalog of the Web, and when compared with the major search engines,
the answer is no, although a few people do find it to be a useful
research resource. For website owners, the links to their websites
that a listïng in DMOZ creatës are useful for search engine
ranking purposes, but even those are becoming less useful as search
engines improve, and seek to block out unwanted duplicate content
from their indexes.
It was a fine concept, and it looked promising for a while, but
the idea of DMOZ becoming the definitive catalog of the Web is gone.
Improvements in the search engines eclipsed its value, and the growth
rate of the Web meant that it could nevër achieve its goal.
It began with an excellent concept, and they gave it a good shot,
but it didn't work. The continuing growth rate of the Web ensures
that it can nevër work. It continues as a good directory of
a large number of web sites, but that is all. And not many people
use directories when the search engines produce such good results,
and so quickly.
About
The Author
Article by Phil Craven of WebWorkShop.
Phil is well-known in the world of webmasters and search engine
optimization and his views have been sought and published by various
online and offline publications.
|
What's the Most Effective
SEO Tactic for 2006?
By Brad Callen
Today, I'm going to try something different. I'm going to go out
on a limb hëre and make a blind assumption about you.
"You
think that the Q-square formula (quality + quantity) of getting
inbound links (reciprocal or one-way) is the best way to increase
your search engine rankings."
Just about right, eh? And unless you are a complete newbie to search
engine optimization, this is exactly what SEO experts have been
telling you time and time and time again. And if there was any doubt
that search engines were being spammed, paid links put rest to those
fears. The SEO experts make monëy, you get a boost in your
rankings, everyone's happy.
Or so they'd have you think.
Over the past year or so, search engines have started to take serious
measures to combat sp@m against them. Search engine spamming usually
occurs in one of three ways:
Multiple submissions of your web pages (you'd be surprised to learn
that people still do this). Keyword spamming in low quality content.
Link spamming (building tons of links to a new site REALLY quickly).
On the other hand, you've probably heard about the need for quality
content ever since you started learning about search engine optimization
(hopefully). Either way, here's a refresher:
Search engines are looking for unique and useful content – information
that is accurate and important to the people interested in that
field. Search engines also look for fresh content – regular additions
to your website, etc (this is why blogging became / is such a huge
craze). So let's put that all together:
Search engines are working towards fighting SEO sp@m – bad, keyword
stuffed content and link spamming – by:
Devaluing the "ranking boost" that these elements give. Penalizing
the websites that are obviously spamming search engines. The end
result?
Traditional link building is no longer your best bet to get high
search engine rankings.
That's not to say that you should dump your link campaigns all at
once and scamper for the hills – links will continue to have value
within search engines and until the search engine algorithms develop
well enough to distinguish between "organic" linking and links generated
through a link-building campaign (not easy to do at all, even with
Google's or Microsoft's resources), getting inbound links will stay
the easiest way to bump up your search engine rankings by several
pages.
However, for SEO purposes, that brings us back to square one. We
like things to be easy, but we also want things to work well. If
link-building is a good tactic, but not the best tactic (especially
when everyone and their mother is getting a few hundred links every
month to their 30-page AdSense websites), then where does it leave
the rest of us?
The answer lies with what the search engines have been saying all
along – quality content, wrapped around quality, organic links.
Let me explain that.
Search engines have taken two specific measures to improve their
results and reduce commercialized sp@m from their search engines:
Link pages are being "identified" as such and therefore are being
considered as low-quality links (you'll remember from Link Building
101 that the quality of the link is a big factor in how much it
improves your website's rankings). Some of the identifying criteria
for a link page are: the number of links on that page, the ratio
of text to links on that page, and relevance of the link, which
I explain in the next point. Search engine algorithms are currently
looking at the context that the links are placed in (i.e. surrounding
text as well as the page's keywords) to measure the relevance of
the host site to YOUR website – in other words, checking the text
of the page your inbound link is placed on to find out whether that
site is relevant to your industry / niche. This leads us to the
following conclusions:
The linking page must have as few links as possible. The links should
be focused on as few sites as possible (to funnel the value of the
link page). The links should be surrounded by "relevant" content.
The linking page should contain "quality" content (written for human
reading rather than written for search engines – there's a sharp
difference between keyword optimization and keyword stuffing). Now you
must be wondering...."is there a point to all this?" And I respect
that, because this is exactly what internet marketing and SEO gurus
have been saying for a long time nöw. Just like I often ask
myself:
So WHAT?
So...
What if I told you that you could use a blindingly simple marketing
tactic that will not only bring you relevant, powerful and valuable
inbound links, but that it will ALSO bring you regular visitors?
How many SEO techniques can promise visitors from other websites?
Nöw I'm not trying to sell you a product, so I'll cut to the
chase.
Take a single page. Take ONE core keyword describing your industry
/ main business, and a few more keywords for a couple of main category
pages. Write 350-550 words of unique, quality content that gives
the reader useful information. Each paragraph should be tightly
focused around one keyword, and should contain one link (not more)
to a related page (for your main keyword, link to your website,
for your category keywords link to your category pages). Use keywords
(but not sentences) as anchor text.
Once you've completed this page, contact link partners in YOUR niche
– not direct competitors obviously, but complementary businesses
(if you sell information books on candle-making, your ideal link
partners would be informational websites on candle-making), and
make them this pitch:
"Are
you looking for a quick and easy way to boost your search engine
rankings? Search engines demand relevance, they demand quality,
they demand freshness. I'd like to offer you the chance to do a
valuable exchange – I'll provide you with an optimized article on
a subject relevant to your business, and in return all I ask is
that you allow me to place some links to my website on the page.
In fact, you can even plug in your own links – affiliate, to your
own website or any other website."
Of course, you'll probably have to write a more sophisticated approach
letter than those 6 lines, but the intent is clear: write quality
content, and then place it on websites relevant to your industry.
Usually, the website hostïng the page will want some monthly
payment in return (after all, you're effectively buying a page on
their website). If you've followed my advice and picked well-ranked
websites with quality content, the monëy will be worth it.
In addition, you'll probably be paying less than an out-and-out
link purchase as you're also giving them something in return (quality
content to boost their search engine rankings).
Got all that? Congratulations. You've just learned about what I
like to call a "Hosted Marketing Page". Don't be fooled by its simplicity.
What I've explained in 4 paragraphs (318 words) will probably be
the subject of endless marketing campaigns and short $49 reports
over the next year.
Nöw some of you might be saying: I know this – isn't this just
another version of marketing your website through articles (where
you write articles, submit them to article directories and have
webmasters pick them up to post on their websites)? What's so great
about this? We KNOW this.
The question isn't that you know this, the question is: are you
doing this? Article submissions are shots in the dark – article
farms do give a better boost in search engine rankings than simple
links, but most article directories are too general to help you
rank well on the relevance factor. If your article gets picked up
by a few webmasters, the extra links will be dampened by the fact
that the content is "duplicated" – thus reducing its value.
Search engines are wising up to article submissions just as they
started combating link sp@m a year and a half ago – at any rate,
article submissions are marketing tools / branding tools, not pure
SEO tools.
Experiment with a Hosted Marketing Page of your own. If you don't
have the time to contact link partners directly, talk to your link-building
expert (or company) and explain what you are looking for (heck,
you can forward this article to them).
The beauty of Hosted Marketing Pages is that they complement your
regular SEO strategy. Link building, if done right, is still a quick
and cheap way of getting higher search engine rankings. However,
if you are looking to make a HUGE splash instead of just poking
around, then I urge you to seriously consider the power of Hosted
Marketing Pages.
If you would like help with your "Hosted Marketing Page" campaign,
visit Textlinkbrokers.com. They are the leader in link popularity
building programs and are the only company offering this particular
service.
About
The Author
Brad Callen - SEO Specialist and Internet Marketing Consultant for
TextLinkBrokers.com
SEOelite.com
|